One major differentiation here is that in Tutanota external recipients can access the entire email thread via the shared password while recipients of encrypted messages from Proton Mail are limited to just seeing one message.
I finally just tried a gmail address instead and it worked fine.Both Proton Mail and Tutanota offer end-to-end encryption for all emails, and both enable users to use a password for encrypting emails sent to recipients that don’t have an address with an encrypted email provider. Each time, I figured screw it, probably broken, I'll try again next month. It was just silently never getting to the payment page and reloading the page to enter an email without any kind of error or failure message. I guess it's a guilty until proven innocent world out there.Īlso I was getting what I thought was an annoying bug trying to register for a video streaming subscription for months under an actual protonmail address I use only for that purpose so the spam it gets doesn't flood regular email. This is true even though I have valid DKIM, registered the domain under a real name, and am the only user and have not been sending spam anywhere. Once I finally started getting through and asked agencies what the heck the deal was, it turned out my emails were automatically going to the spam folder or not even being delivered, provided their own providers were Microsoft or Google, which was true of just about all of them. I have a custom domain that is an alias to protonmail and was having trouble when I first started trying to do foster care licensing. So I would possibly agree that filtering out 90% is too much even if I'm not desperate, but I haven't encountered that problem because I'm not trying to contact a large number of new strangers. I haven't noticed any special problem with my own PM address, but I have never tried to cold call anyone from it.
While from the other side, I don't necessarily consider it to be stupidly filtering out potential employers, because I am not desperate for any scrap of employment. Those are probably exactly the most valuable people to their own interests. While they are pre-judging others for not using gmail because they see that as weird, I am a valuable capable potential producer judging them for their failings of both academic integrity (as in you just shouldn't do that simply because it's not right) AND also seperately for their failing of pure intelligence and their own self interest, because in fact some of the smartest most capable people are the ones willingly and knowingly taking on the burden of not using gmail for either practical or principled reasons, and they are filtering those people out, which I judge to be stupid. But I am also intentionally informing them how their actions may be percieved by a bystander, or their own potential resource pool.
0 kommentar(er)
